what states still teach cursive what's the history of cursive?
what states still teach cursive
In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether to continue teaching cursive handwriting in schools or switch to digital alternatives. This article will explore the current status of cursive education across different states and discuss its historical significance.
Cursive writing, also known as script or longhand, is a style of handwriting that involves connecting letters together, making it faster and more legible than printing. The ability to write in cursive has been an essential skill for centuries, serving various purposes including note-taking, letter-writing, and even artistic expression. However, with the rise of digital communication and technology, the importance of cursive has been questioned.
Currently, 45 states in the United States still require some level of cursive instruction in their public school systems. These states include Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
On the other hand, several states have eliminated cursive instruction from their curriculums entirely. These states include Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia (after 2023), Iowa (effective 2024), Kentucky (after 2024), Montana (after 2024), Nebraska (after 2024), New Hampshire (after 2024), New Mexico (after 2024), North Carolina (after 2024), North Dakota (after 2024), Oklahoma (after 2024), Oregon (after 2024), South Carolina (after 2024), South Dakota (after 2024), Tennessee (after 2024), Texas (after 2024), Utah (after 2024), Vermont (after 2024), Virginia (after 2024), Washington (after 2024), West Virginia (after 2024), and Wisconsin (after 2024).
The decision to retain or eliminate cursive education often stems from differing opinions on the necessity of this skill in today’s digital age. Proponents argue that learning cursive improves fine motor skills, enhances memory, and fosters creativity. They also believe that mastering cursive can be beneficial for academic success, particularly in subjects like history and literature where students need to read handwritten texts. Additionally, many educators maintain that the ability to read and write in cursive remains relevant for certain professional contexts, such as legal documents and diplomas.
However, critics contend that the time spent teaching cursive could be better utilized for more practical and applicable skills, such as typing, coding, and critical thinking. They also argue that digital communication and technology have made cursive less necessary in everyday life. Furthermore, some suggest that eliminating cursive instruction aligns with broader efforts to reduce the amount of time devoted to traditional pen-and-paper activities in favor of more engaging and interactive methods of learning.
Regardless of the stance taken, the debate over cursive education highlights the ongoing tension between preserving traditional skills and adapting to modern technological advancements. As technology continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how educational institutions address this issue and determine the best approach for preparing students for the future.
相关问答
-
Q: 为什么一些州选择继续教授手写体？
- A: 多数州选择继续教授手写体是因为认为它对学生的认知发展和学术表现有益，同时也因为它在某些专业领域中的实际应用价值。
-
Q: 手写体在日常生活中还有必要学习吗？
- A: 虽然在数字化时代，手写体的重要性受到了质疑，但许多教育者仍认为它对于历史、文学等课程中的阅读和理解仍然有帮助。此外，它在某些专业领域（如法律文件）中仍然是必要的。
-
Q: 是否所有学生都需要学习手写体？
- A: 学习手写体的具体要求因州而异。有些州要求所有学生掌握手写体，而其他州则选择根据学生的兴趣或需要来决定是否教授手写体。